Extending Canada’s military mission in Afghanistan does not require Parliament’s approval because the new approach will focus on training, not combat, Prime Minister Stephen Harper said Friday.
In 2008, Mr. Harper opted to seek Parliament’s support for a motion extending Canada’s military mission in Afghanistan through to July 2011, a vote the government won easily 198-77.
More related to this story
- Harper’s turnaround: PM says he felt he had to extend Afghan mission
- That wire in Afghanistan? It’s barbed
- Lying politicians/revolting voters
Should Canadian troops remain in Afghanistan past 2011 to conduct non-combat training missions?37% 2080 votes
63% 3505 votes
But this time is different, Mr. Harper answered when asked if another extension, one that is focused on training Afghan soldiers in Kabul until 2014, would require a similar vote.
“My position is if you’re going to put troops into combat, into a war situation, I do think for the sake of legitimacy, I do think the government does require the support of Parliament,” he said. “But when we’re talking simply about technical or training missions, I think that is something the executive can do on its own.”
The Prime Minister said he was aware however of recent comments made by Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff and Liberal foreign affairs critic Bob Rae that he said indicated they support a new training mission.
“Look, I do note that the Liberal party, Mr. Ignatieff, Mr. Rae have indicated for the past several months that they favour a training mission,” he said. “If they have any specific ideas they want to share, I’m not resistant to having debates on that matter in the House of Commons. But I do think when it comes to decisions such as this, the government has to be free to act.”
Harper says Parliament’s okay not needed to extend Afghan missionIn Canada on November 12, 2010 at 09:33